Showing posts with label Federico Fellini. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federico Fellini. Show all posts

Friday, May 09, 2014

Film Fest Friday: Fellini's "La Strada"

 photo 51RP0J8B69L_zps96c52ed2.jpg



"La Strada" (The Road) 1954, Federico Fellini (1920-1993).This is a truly great film (number 8 on my top 10). As with La Dulce Vita everything I have to say about it has been said before.This is Fellini's first success. Before this he put out some great films, the quirky comedy "the White Sheik" and I Vitelloni (1953)  and others but they had all been bombs at the box office. Finally with this one he makes his first big impact. It's a truly great film, one of his best. It's my second favorite Fellini film. As I have pointed out before, this film, while his first success was also his first step away from Italian neo realism. Fillini was always drawn to the circus. He loved circuses. So his step away from neo realism is a step toward his own personal version of a style that,if it were in a novel, it would be called "magical realism."


 photo 220px-Masina_zps58b42f42.jpg
  as
Gelsomina.


Gelsomina is a peasant girl who lives with her mother and sisters by the beach in Southern Italy. She spends all of her time on the beach, she is simple minded and has a report with animals.. The girl, played by Fellini's wife () steals the film.The actress is funny looking and strange.She is a fine actress and brings to the part a freshness and expressiveness that allowes her to convey deep emotion with very few words. She is doing most of her acting as a kind of mime, not in the traditional sense of a mime pretending to be behind glass or whatever, but through facial expressions and body language; she conveys more than the character could say with words. The actual character apart from the actress is quirky, profound in her simplicity, superb in her buffoonery. She is a true clown, both character and actress.Giulietta Masina was tied into a thousand year old artistic tradition in Europe going back to the commedia dell’arte.   She has been daubed the Femlae Chales Chaplin.
The film much more than just a sad tale of a brutal idiot who abuses a young girl, although it is that. Fellini elevates it to a much higher level. Gelsomina is bought by the brute Zampanò (his name is said to sound like the Italian word for an animal's paw) (played by American Actor ). The language was dubbed in by an Italian actor. In fact becuase the sound was bad all the actors in the shooting of the film were just speaking at random or reciting numbers, the language as dubbed in latter. So Quinn's actual voice is not heard.

Zampano guys the girl literally from her mother for money and food. We also learn that he made the same arrangement concerning the sister the year before. Her sister died and now he needs another girl. She is happy to go and excited, it doesn't even cross her mind that her sister's death might have something to do with working for Zampano. He begins teaching her the "art." It's really just taking money and introducing him. His act is totally unimaginative. It's nothing more one a trick based upon his strength. He breaks a chain around his chest. His training of the girl consists of forcing her to memorize the intro by wrote and when she makes a mistake he swats her with a switch cut form a tree limb. He's really just training her as one would a dog. At least that's said by the commentator on the DVD commentary.I wouldn't train my dog that way. She get's no recognition. She does get raped, or at least "laid." She doesn't really fight back but doesn't have any say in the matter either.

They travel about giving little performances wherever they can they pass the hat. It's really just him breaking a chain. They do some skits they've worked put, but they are very childish and basic. They travel in a "caravan" or a motorcycle with a sort of truck bed on the back and covered. It's only big enough for two people to lie down in. They live a very hand to mouth existence. They eat a lot of stew and get a lot of the ingredients from vegetables and roots growing wild. There is pain connected with their lives, but there is also a magic that the girl is turned on to. One example is a country house where a party is held. They are all eating outdoors, celebrating a marriage. Zampano and the widowed mother of the bride go off to "try on some clothes" that the widow is giving Zampano. The girl sort of half knows the turth of what they are going to do. She explores the huge farm house (really more of a manor house) with children. She finds in a upstairs bedroom a boy in bed named "Oswald" who is deformed. His head is big and he looks like an elf. She tries to put on a clown show for him and cheer him up. She is enchanted with this elf life kid. A nun comes in and chases them out. So it's the chruch that breaks up the fun. But Gelsomina is taken with this kid, she's turned on to the magic in the whole situation, the children, the farm,t he beauty of art.

 photo la20strada_zps3f9ee41e.jpg

Yet when Zampano finds a prostitute he goes off with her, leaving the girl to sit alone all night wondering if he will come back. She follows him around like this. As we go through time we see her become more clown-like in her costume and attire and acting. She is more fitted into the part of his assistant, she is proud of the fact that "he taguht me all I know." All she really knows is saying "here's Zampano!" and taking the money. Finally they tie up with a little circus. Apparently these little circuses were all over Italy like strange attractions used to be all over the road side of the American South in the 50s. Here they meet the secnd important man in Gelsomina's life,Il Matto - "the fool"    I Knew him as a middle aged actor on "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,"  here he is young and thin and wiry.  The fool can't resist antagonizing Zampano. We find there is some drama between them over Gelsomina's sister. Apprently they had some kind of jealous rivalry going over her. This is repeated with Gelsomina. But more than that, the fool is drawn to prosecute Zampano like a moth to flame. He's like the counter balancing will of Krama to take vengeance upon the  abuser by pestering him. The fool shows an interest in  the Gelsomina. He puts her in his act and shows consideration to her. She is falling in love with him. At one point she might have gone off with him.

I call it a moth to a flame because Zampano would and really could easily kill him. He's much bigger and much more brutal. The fool is a live-by-your-wits kind of Guy. Zampano is a take what you can kind of guy. The fool is the kind of guy who talks the bully out of fighting, Zampano is the kind of guy who refuses to be talked out of the fight. The fool begins waiting until the moment of drama when Zampano is just about to break the chain around his chest. There's a spot light, a drum role, the audience is hushed and waiting, the fool shouts "phone call for you Zampano!" Of course there isn't one and he has to start all over. Another time he's taking part in a skit and the bucket is supposed to be filled with confetti but it's water and he get's splashed. He chases the fool with a knife. He's really going to kill him. The police come and he's arrested. They have bail him out. The fool splits and they all go in different directions the girl is with Zampano.

The girl and Zampano stop at a convent and stay there a few days. The fool had told The girl that everything has a purpose. Even a stone has a great purpose in the over all scheme of things. Zampano whats to rob the nuns. The girl refuses, and she is adamant. He leaves the next day, she goes with him. She could have stayed with the convent, and she loved it there. But she is following what the fool told her and choosing to love the unlovable Zampano. She seems herself as choosing to fulfill a noble purpose by being the one person who would love this jerk that no one has ever loved. The problem is along the way they find the fool broken down along the board. He's trying to fix a flat. Zampano has him. He has no where to run, his enemy is upon him before he even knows it.

Zampano only wants to rough him up to pay him back for pestering him. He accidentally kills him. He punches him and he hits head. He dies. Of cousre the girl is totally coming unglued. Zampano hides the body and the fool's car. They go on their way but the girl proceeds over the next couple of months to lose her mind. She begins crying constantly. She goes around saying "the fool is hurt, the fool is hurt." Zampano has a unique problem. The girl has activated within him some human feelings he didn't know he had. He's growing a conscience thanks to her. For the firs time he feels really guilty. Seeing her so distraught over the fool he feels really ad and doesn't know what to do about it. He can't stand to hear her can't stand to hear her plaintive cries. It's tearing him up inside to hear "the fool is hurt." He tries to take her home but she wont go.

Finally he leaves her and goes off on his own. We next see him a few years latter. He's viably much older. He can barely do his trick now, he can't break the chain very well. He's obviously on his last legs. He goes back to the area where he he left her and tries to find her. He hears someone singing the little tune that she picked up from the fool and sang all the time. He asks the woman where she learned it and she said it was taguht to her by a strange homeless woman a few years earlier. He learned the homeless woman died. We can see it's here. The description is clear. So he goes off, he's aging, he's out of it, he's goign down hill. He feels guilty about his life, but the one person would would forgive him and would have taken care of him in his old age is dead as a result of him own temper and inability to control himself.

The God stuff is a lot harder to find in this film. The chruch is not that visible when it is it's either shutting down the party of just being a victim. The nuns did take them in and gave them food and clothes but they also were almost robbed by Zampano and he did work for them. So the chruch wasn't much of a factor. There aren't a lot of sermons and a lot of mentions of how thing should be. It's clear that's some word about human frailty, the inability to separate ourselves om our sin nature, the underlying human condition. There's also a hint about higher meaning, the big picture, the scale upon which even humble rock has a purpose. There's also the magic of life in which a fool can elevate the purpose of a clown. The girl is a martyr, she give her life to love the unlovable. Through her unselfish act, which she can't live with after he killers something inside her by causing the fool's death, Zampano finds a kind of redemption. His humanity s turned on by her sacrifice. Yet is is not a redemption he sought, he doesn't understand it, and it proves to be his undoing. In the end it's not exactly a story of Christian redemption.




IMBd page

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Anthony Quinn ...
Zampanò
Giulietta Masina ...
Richard Basehart ...
Il Matto - The Fool
Aldo Silvani ...
Signor Giraffa
Marcella Rovere ...
La Vedova
Livia Venturini ...
La Suorina

Friday, May 02, 2014

Film Fest Friday: La Dulce Vita (1960)


 photo La_Dolce_Vita_281960_film29_coverart_zps57cd016a.jpg


La Dulce Vita (The good life), Federico Fellini (1960).   I am about the ten millionth person to review this film. I have nothing original to say about it, it's all coming from the commentary on the DVD plus what I've learned about Cinema over the years, but nevertheless I take great pleasure in discussing it. This is one of the greatest films ever made. It's clearly up there with Bergman's the Seventh Seal. It's going to be in the top ten of any critic worth his celluloid. It's number 2 in my top 10.* At first glance this might appear to be a banal look at a group of shallow play boy and play girl fashion model types form the late 50's who lived in Italy and had no thoughts in their heads. So what? I like to review great art films that have something to say about God, such as  Wild Strawberries, but what does this pack of refugees from the Italian version of "the Nanny" have to do with God? A lot actually, there's much more going on there than meets the eye. First we have to fix the film in relation to cenematic history.

It's the break out film for two of the biggest stars of the 60s, Anita Ekberg, and Marcello Mastroianni. Ekberg is probably best known for her scene in Trevi fountain from La Dulce Vita. The film itself is located in Italian neorealism which is very important thing to know. But even more important is the fact that it was seen as a step away from neorealism. Neorealism was very important to Italian intellectuals becuase it represented their social critique, their come back after the war, their triumph over fascism and their independence form Western Capitalism.Yet Fellini was moving away from it. His previous film La Strada   (The road 1954) began his departure. Though this film fits within its contours it's not about workers, it's not about the people it's about strange alienated isolated people who are above the level of the common man, it's about the leaches who live off of the wealth of the system and produce nothing and help no one. It's not that Fellini is easy on these parasites. He's hard on them but his critique is not social, it's not Marxist, it's spiritual. That's why the film has a lot to say about God. Fellini was a believer but he was not a Christian. He spoke of himself as a Christian in a veg way, but he was not a friend of the Catholic chruch. He did not fail to criticize the Catholic chruch and his views were veg and undefined. Yet he knew that modern humanity has a spiritual plight that is at the root of the human condition, that's what the film is about, more specifically the way that plight is coming to affect  modern society, what we can expect from the 1960s. Even though that is horribly out of date one can look back and see Fellini got it right and that same plight still besets us today. The names have changed now it's not Anita Ekberg (or her character "Slyvia") but The Cardassians or whomever,  but it's still there.



This sense of a modern spiritual crisis is nowhere in the film better born out than the opening scene were a great statue of Jesus is ferried by helicopter across the city of Rome right by the ancinet coliseum. It looks like a giant version of the plastic statue on the dash board. It is seen by a group of bikini clad women sun bathing on the roof. As it's flown by the coliseum one thinks "there's the old place where they gave them bread and circuses and kept them entertained, kept them off the streets, watching Chrsitians die; now here's the victorious Christian symbol, now reduced to another level of bread and circuses. The women talk to the copter men and refuse to give their pone numbers. The spiritual dimension is reduced to a commodity. That's where we first meet Marcello Mastroianni's character, Marcello Rubini. He's among the Paparazzi. This film is where the term "Paparazzi" originated. It's named after one the characters, Poparazzo (). He's not a major character but he's always doing everything he can to get pictures. In one scene he takes advantage of a woman's grief over her husband's suicide. In another he's arranging the boyd of a sleeping American movie star who is waiting in a little convertible all night for Sylvia to come back from her romp in the fountain with Marcello. He and the other photographers are playing around with this sleeping guy who wakes up and beats up Marcello for keeping Sylvia out.

The little circle of fashion plate vips in the film are unmotivated, trapped in their fame and fotrune which has given them a form of indolence. Marcello has ambitions, although veg ones, but he will never act on them. He longs for a woman, Maddalena () but he can't bring himself to really close the deal. A good example is the romp in the fountain  with Sylvia. The fountain (Trevi) is ancient, the water if flowing into a little pool. It's a hot summer night, the most beautiful woman in the world is calling him into the water with her. Flowing water has always been a symbol of potency and sexual life. As soon as they start to kiss, the water is shut off. They leave and wade out, as always he's just cut off before he gets to the point and always resigns to it and goes with the flow. The opening scene is the big Jesus and the next scene after that is a night club, an exotic rarefied atmosphere where dancers from Thailand illustrate a sexually provocative version of some nature dance. Christianity is reduced to a consumer product or decoration and this foreign religion is brought in but turned into an aphrodisiac. Nothing is sacred. Everything is a product. Everything is to be sold to the consumer for pleasure.

Macello picks up Maddalena from that night club and takers to a place where they pick up a prostitute, they drive around with her. Apparently just driving in a fancy car (big plush American car) is a thrill for her. They wind up at her apartment. Oddly enough they have sex with each other in her room and she sits out  in the living room. Good Filliniesque touch, the apartment is flooded and she has walk on board bridges all over the place. In the cold harsh light of dawn the prostitute is out side discussing with her pimp what she get out of them. Maddalena makes a sort of arrangement with her for future occasions. The lower class people who scramble for a living who have imitative to discuss money, while the jet setters just sort slink away.


 photo sightseeing-rome-rome-tours-sightseeing-rome-things-to-do-rome-la-dolce-vita_zps534dbad5.jpg

The structure of the film is made up of a series of vignettes which adhere to a formula that is never varied. The action starts at night, when the burned-out hipster's days begin.The night seems packed with promise. It's a sexual adventure, it's a new life, it's a sense of thrilled packed new exploration. It always screws up. They are always then shown in the cold harsh light of dawn. For Fellini Dawn always brings this sense of clean clarity; now I see how we screwed up. Now I see I need change, but I wont change. Another aspect that reinforces this structure is the recurrence of wasteland. Most of the film takes place in new parts of Rome which lie on the outskirts and used to be either country or bombed out areas. They are also full of new apartment complexes that eitehr just went up or are going up. The only old stuff he shows, the things that make Rome seem like Rome are old dilapidated falling apart stuff (except the fountain). The other exception to that is the Vita Aventino. Fellini had a bad feeling about that place. He saw it as the headquarters or the center of the problem with modern humanity. It's the ultimate dumping ground for shallow people. Macello is always being called to "chow Marcello" as walks down that street where he obviously spends a great deal of time. These are clearly superficial relationships. This is the Italian version of "let's do lunch, have your people call my people."

After the fountain scene, the morning after, (in the harsh light of dawn he got his ass kicked by the American movie star) he is sitting around on the street and there's a horse on a table. Why? It has nothing to do with anything. It's just a Felliniesque moment as there are many in his films where he goes a bit nuts in the back ground for no reason. Marcello goes into the cathedral across the way to visit his friend Steiner (). Steiner is an intellectual, philosopher and a modern. He has religion behind and he's not going back to it. Yet he mourns its passing. He knows something is missing because this is no longer a major force. He desperately wants to find that lost element again. Yet he's not going back to religion to find it. He mourns it none the less. When Marcello goes to meet him he is hanging out in a chruch and playing religious music on the organ. Latter Marcello attends a  Salon at Steiner's house. The guests are second rate intellectuals. They are more posers than real thinkers. They quote excessively from various writers and never really say anything. Marcello voices his veg ambitions and desires for clarity and understanding. They can only quote half applicable maxims and move on with their shallow pretense. The hilarious Felliniesque** moment in the scene is where it comes out that Steiner has recorded sounds of ordinary life such as rain. they are dying to hear. They all make out likes it's an innovative creative thing. The point is they are not even experiencing the real, they are experiencing a virtual reality because it's the sounds of ordinary things. They are making over ordinary life that they don't live as though its' a major breakthrough but its' not even real.

Another aspect of the modern world and it's loss of faith, and faith commoditized for the masses. Marcello, who is a reporter, goes out to cover a story about these two children who are supposed to have seen the virgin Mary. They go to the spot where they saw her, where supposedly a tree grew up spontaneously, there's a crowd and a camera set up and tv hook up, the press, the paparazzi the reporters. The children go on this ridiculous charade of pretending to see the Virgin "she's over here," they all run over there, "now she's over there." they keep the crowd running around whopping and hollering and seeking to be in the very spot, until they erupt int o a riot. they tear the tree to shreds to get holy relics of it. Almost as if God's response to the absurdity, it begins to rain. The tv lights break, and the power goes out. Again, ancient things getting in the way of modern. the modern thing here is the shallow mindless nature of religious frenzy diverged from theology is left as the product for the masses. The event is over because the press can't cover it (as though God is gonna leave the scene since he can't be on tv) and they all leave. The one touching moment is when Marcello's live in girl friend who has already tried to kill her self in the film prays sincerely "let Marcello love me like I love him." Then she sees that's not in the cards. He doesn't love her she is just more of a habit than a real relationship. She realized she must accept that.



 photo poster2_zps3c7ac20c.jpg


There's so much in this film I have not even scratched he surface. There's a motif of the past getting in the way of the modern, in subtle ways. One example is the sheep blocking the road in the middle of modern Rome as the entourage escorts Anita Ekberg back from t he air port where she has been met by the press, as major celebrity, the newest "blond bombshell" fashion model/actress. The mourning of the past is reflected in a scene where the revelers stay at an old castle belonging to the family of one of them. It's abandoned and no longer lived in as they roam around exploring it they reveal various sides to their nature, yet at the same time finding connections to the past. I am not following the plot point for point there is much more here.

The final enigmatic scene as been written about and speculated upon. No one is quite sure  what it means. After a night of debauchery and wild party, Marcello, Maddalena and others stand on the beach watching a strange sea creature that has been discovered. They think it's a living specimen of a fish thought to have been extinct for thousands of years. Now it's dying on the beach in front of the home where the night before the raveled, Marcello riding around the room on Maddalena's back. Now they watch the end of this line that has survived a couple of millions of years. Here's the theme of the mourning for the dying of the past. The idea that we are missing something. We didn't know it was still there but now it's dying out. It reminds me of the line form Philosopher Karl Jaspers that the modern age is bringing to an end things that are extremely ancient. Our  way of life is putting an end to them. But also reflected in the puzzled awe the "mourners" reveal a sense of suspicion, is this a forshadowing of the demise or their own lives, or their way of life? Will our modern world last as long as this? Will some alien race watch our decedents die on a future beach? Or will we be annihilated by nuclear war next year? These are not statements they make, they are reflections the viewer thinks of watching their faces.

IMBd page:

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Marcello Mastroianni ...
Anita Ekberg ...
Anouk Aimée ...
Maddalena (as Anouk Aimee)
Yvonne Furneaux ...
Emma
Magali Noël ...
Fanny (as Magali Noel)
Alain Cuny ...
Annibale Ninchi ...
Il padre di Marcello
Walter Santesso ...
Lex Barker ...
Robert - marito di Sylvia
Jacques Sernas ...
Il divo
Nadia Gray ...
Nadia
Valeria Ciangottini ...
Paola
Riccardo Garrone ...
Riccardo
Ida Galli ...
Debuttante dell'anno
Audrey McDonald ...
Jane (as Audey McDonald)



*Seventh Seal (Ingmar Bergman)
La Dulce Vita (Federico Fellini)
The Bicycle Thief (Vittorio De Sica)
Wild Strawberries (Bergman)
The Virgin Spring (Bergman)

Rashomon, (Akira Kurosawa)
The Seven Samurai, (Akira Kurosawa)
La Strada (Federico Fellini)
Dr. Strangelove, (Stanly Kubrick)
Ordet (Carl Drayer)

**Felliniesque has become a standard word in film criticism. It refers to the funcky stuff onkly Fellini can do, his sense of magical realism like the horse just standing on the table for no reason.