Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Dialogue with Atheist on the faith

Star - Wikipedia




Here I distill a discussion on Rauser;s blog with an atheist, I'm extracting the best parts. I wanted to Nasser this guy becuase I was an atheist and found Jesus,He was a Christian and gave  up.

https://randalrauser.com/2020/05/can-a-pastor-have-doubts/#comment-4928430136

I wrestled with my faith, was honest about my doubts and studied it to the best of my abilities for over a decade. I slowly and thoughtfully came to the conclusion Christianity was a man made religion without an ounce of involvement from god. Do you have a huge respect for me too?
I don't respect you because I don't know
you. But I was raised in a Christian home, fundamentalist.. Became an atheist then discovered Jesus was saved. What I don't respect is the idea "without an ounce of involvement from god." It is obvious Christianity has something going for it. when It produces St Paul. Mother Teresa, Tom Douley, Joan of Arc and and Kierkegaard obviously it has something, As an atheist you can't it's God but it is not just bull shit.

I really wish I could trace our reasoning on the issues, bet I could answer all your objections. But That's only because belief in God is highly personal and I an satisfied with my own answers, Atheists play games with empirical proof which is a meaninglessness concept. God arguments serve a useful purpose but they can;t prove Gpd. You should not expect them to.


  • Here he asks what I think God arguments do: "God arguments area good way to think about the nature of God, they set up ideas that demonstrate how /God might have to be, Also they warrant belief. While they don't prove it they can offer rational reasons to believe,"

    "Christian apologists wave off the problem of evil as a 9th grade argument which no one takes seriously. They then offer an ancient story of a young woman eating a piece of fruit as a reasonable explanation for the moment of tectonic plates."

    Hinman
    Yes there us a lot of bad apologetics. One thing I hope to accomplish is to help provide alternatives.I take theodicy seriously because it was one of my major points as an atheist.See my website:
    Dana Harper
    "Empirical proof is a meaningless concept and I after I don’t provide any proof, I want you to find the defendant guilty”.

    Hinman
    My statements about empirical proof are contextual. they apply to specifically arguments for God, I would not disparage empirical proof of the gilt of a human defendant because it is possible to have empirical evidence. But it is not
    possible to have empirical evidence of God, we can;t see God, God is too big for us to see or to capture in empirical proofs. I say "too big" figuratively hes beyond the range of our sense data.
    On monday I will have a specious discussion on my view of Problem of pain and evil.I invite Dana to take part I ask everyone be part of it.

    Monday, May 25, 2020

    God Index Page

    Star Facts 🌟 - Interesting Facts about Stars



    I am under the weather today  did not post last night, I am sorry. Here's the key to my writings on the net

    https://www.doxa.ws/

    My God Index page
    God
    Theology

    empirical evidence of Supernatural part 2
    M scale arguments

    The Nature of Theology
    Tutorial for Atheists

    The Nature of Truth*NEW*

    The Religious a priori

    Question of being: brute fact or deep structure?

    Evolutionary Development of God Concept Part 1 *NEW*

    part 2

    How do we Know God is not Evil?

    What is PanENtheism?

    Do Christians, Jews, and Muslims have the Same God?

    Faith of confusing in moernity
    Definition of fait

    Does Omnipotence contradict Omniscience or free will*NEW*

    Phenomenology

    Saint Augustine's Notion That God is Truth

    Realizing God

    Beyond God Arguments

    Logic of The Lampost

    Phenomenology and Theological Method part 1
    I have put up many versions of this one,k this may be the best


    Being itself

    What is being itself? (this time Ive got it)***

    Hans Urs Von Balthasar

    The Super Essential Godhead*New*

    HRG's arguments on Being itself

    St. Augustine and Superessential Godhead

    Tillich

    Intro to Tillich's Existential Ontology (God = Beimng itself) (1)

    ...Part 2

    Paul Tillich, Phenomenology, and Theological Method

    Paul Tillich's ontology: Deep Structures

    Depth of Being and Tillich's Implied Ontological Argument

    Paul Tillich's Implied Ontological Argument

    Rumors That Tillich was Death of God Theologian Greatly Exaggerated

    The Courage to be vs The Cowardly Mind

    Paul Tillich and The Personal God

    Tillich and Personal God part 2*NEW*

    Tillich Phenomenology and Theological Method


    Arguments for existence of God

    Debate: Hinman v Bowen: Belief rationally waranted
    * Josesph Hinman, "Preparation for my debate with Bowen." Metacrock's blog, (JUNE 25, 2017)(ACESSED  7/12/17)http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2017/06/preparation-for-my-debate-with-bowen.html
    this is Preperation or Q/Q doc
    * Joseph Hinman, "Opening argument Resolved : that belief in God is rationally warranted," Metacrcock's blog (JULY 02, 2017)(accessed 7/12/17 )http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2017/07/opening-argument-resolved-that-belief.html
    this is "opening argument" doc
    * Joseph Hinman, "First Defense of God Argument 1," Metacrock's blog(JULY 09, 2017) (ACCESSEDhttp://metacrock.blogspot.com/2017/07/first-defense-of-god-argument-1.html*Bowen -
    Hinman Debate: existence of God; Hinman Second defense https://metacrock.blogspot.com/2017/07/bowen-hinman-debate-existence-of-god.html



    Causal linkage im God arguments*NEW*
    cross reference with Science list


    Mystical Experience:Empirical Evidence of SN***
    artical version of my book for academic journals

    argument from Religious a priori

    Jeff Lowder, Fine Tuning Bait and Switch


    Debate Challenge to Atheists: Cosmological Argument

    Arguing God On The Brain Argument

    Reverse Design argument

    Against Infinite Causal Regression

    Is God Complex?
    Dawkins uses complexity as anti-God argument

    Warrant

    Counter apologist attacks the moral argumemt*NEW*





    Wednesday, May 20, 2020