Monday, January 24, 2011

Give me some feed back!

My hit rate was great until I hit Christmas and went on break. I neded a break. the readership didn't come back. No one is reading the block. now. why?

why have I lost the readership? 50 people in a day sux. why? I want feedback.

tell me

12 comments:

Mike aka MonolithTMA said...

Sorry, man. I just haven't been in the mood for God arguments, etc. lately so I haven't been commenting.

Brap Gronk said...

I subscribe via RSS so I do read or at least scan every post, but I don't hit the web site unless it's something I might want to comment on.

Kristen said...

I've been kind of busy with No Longer Quivering stuff and other things, but now I should have some more time.

Kristen said...

One thing I might suggest is shortening your posts-- covering the same amount of material but in four or five segments instead of two or three. Reading very long blog posts is daunting, particularly when someone is already crunched for time. If I knew that investing in reading the latest post would be 10 or 15 minute investment rather than 20 or 25, I'd be more likely to stop by every day. :)

Anonymous said...

Maybe people have seen through your rather weak arguments.

Metacrock said...

Anonymous said...

Maybe people have seen through your rather weak arguments.


what's weak about them? you can't tell me.

It's funny thing about the way atheists don't think. They are always saying "your arguments are not logical" when I ask them to show me the rule of logic that they violate they never can.

when an atheist says "an argument is weak" what he really mans is that it doesn't fit the atheist template that the brain washing tells you to follow.

You hold it to up to the templaet you say "does this fit?" the template says only believe scietnfiically proved facts, then only those that help atheism, discord any facts that disprove our arguments. So then you say "this is a God argument so it doesn't help atheisem so it must be weak and wrong.

that's your only criterion isn't it? it doesn't fit your heed to hate God so it's weak.
admit, you have no concept of how to think properly. you know you don't.

Cory said...

I try to read daily, your site has been a blessing to me -- please be encouraged, I'm sure the readership will return in due time.

You don't have weak arguments, btw -- don't feel the need to respond to anonymous commenters too gutless to attach their names to their claims.

Metacrock said...

Thanks Cory. I really appreciate that! I do.

Tory said...

As Brap Gronk said, I often read through an RSS reader. Also, you're posts are often quite long and so can be daunting.

I have a question: I'm sure you have answered this before, and I don't mean any offense by it, but you often have lots of spelling errors in your posts. Do you use a speech-to-text program, is English not your first languge, or do you just not proof read what you write?

I ask because your posts are very sophisticated so the spelling erros just seem out of place. Again, I mean no offense by it, I am just very curious!

Metacrock said...

2:44 PM
Tory said...

As Brap Gronk said, I often read through an RSS reader. Also, you're posts are often quite long and so can be daunting.

I have a question: I'm sure you have answered this before, and I don't mean any offense by it, but you often have lots of spelling errors in your posts. Do you use a speech-to-text program, is English not your first languge, or do you just not proof read what you write?

I ask because your posts are very sophisticated so the spelling erros just seem out of place. Again, I mean no offense by it, I am just very curious!


I know all about the spelling thing. I must say it wasn't nearly as big a problem getting up into doctoral work with that dyslexia as it is just being accepted on the net. Professors in graduate school were will to accept it with one explanation but on the net I have to keep explaining it all the time.

spelling continues to be a probelm for a variety of reasons. First becuase if the problem is seeing things eschew like saw becomes "was" and so on...spell check does not change that. Secondly, I use bits of older stuff from the site I think "I've checked this" and I haven't becuase it's old. So I'm importing a bunch of new errors.

Tory said...

Thank you for the explanatin. Keep up the good work!!

Metacrock said...

no problem