Sunday, September 22, 2024

No connection between Jesus and Mithra



There is still a strong current of Jesus mythicusm on the net. It used to be much stronger. In the days of Ashayra S. one saw copy cat savior stuff everywhere. We do not see that nonsense as much now but it is stil there. My favorite target to disprove was those who claimed Christianity,and Jesus, were copuied after Pagan sources especially Mithrism.

The Mythic Mysteries are very complex, and the only real similarities to Jesus are minute ones.. Most of these alleged similarities are suspect or unimportant. It is often claimed by skeptics on the Internet that "there is so much similarity" but I find very little. Mithra comes from Persia and is part of Zoroastrian myth, but this cult was transplanted to Rome near the end of the pre-Christian era. Actually the figure of Mithra is very ancient. He began in the Hindu pantheon and is mentioned in the Vedas. He latter spread to Persia where he took the guise of a sheep protecting deity. But his guise as a shepherd was rather minor. He is associated with the Sun as well. Yet most of our evidence about his cult (which apparently didn't exist in the Hindu or Persian forms) comes from Post-Pauline times. Mythric rituals were meant to bring about the salvation and transformation of initiates. In that sense it could be seen as similar to Christianity, but it was a religion and all religions aim at ultimate transformation. He's a total mythical figure he meets the sun who kneels before him, he slays a cosmic bull, nothing is real or human, no sayings, no teachings.

1) no Virginal Conception

Mithra was born of a rock, so unless the rock was a virgin rock, no virginal conception for him.[1] David Ulansey, who is perhaps the greatest Mithric scholar of the age, agrees that Mithras was born out of a rock, not of a virgin woman. He was also born as a full grown adult.[2]

2) No crucifixion or resurrection.

There no story of Mithras death and no references to resurrection. The only similarity about him in this relation is that his shedding of the Bull's blood is said by H.G. Wells (Out Line of World History ) to be the prototype for Jesus sacrifice on the cross. But in reality the only similarity here is blood, and it wasn't even his own. It may even be borrowing form Christianity that made the shedding of blood important in the religion. Gordon says directly, that there is "no death of Mithras"[3]

3) No Savior, no baptism, no Christmas

Moreover, one of the major sources comes from the second century AD and is found in inscriptions on a temple, "and you saved us after having shed the eternal blood." This sounds Christian, but being second century after Christ it could well be borrowed from Christianity [4] "Mithra was the Persian god whose worship became popular among Roman soldiers (his cult was restricted to men) and was to prove a rival to Christianity in the late Roman Empire. Early Zoroastrian texts, such as the Mithra Yasht, cannot serve as the basis of a mystery of Mithra in as much as they present a god who watches over cattle and the sanctity of contracts. Later Mithraic evidence in the west is primarily iconographic; there are no long coherent texts".[5]

4) Most of our sources Post Date Christianity.

(a) Almost no Textual evidence exists for Mithraism

Most of the texts that do exist are from outsiders who were speculating about the cult. We have no information form inside the cult.[6]



David Ulansey (the Major scholar of Mithraism in world):

Owing to the cult's secrecy, we possess almost no literary evidence about the beliefs of Mithraism. The few texts that do refer to the cult come not from Mithraic devotees themselves, but rather from outsiders such as early Church fathers, who mentioned Mithraism in order to attack it, and Platonic philosophers, who attempted to find support in Mithraic symbolism for their own philosophical ideas. "At present our knowledge of both general and local cult practice in respect of rites of passage, ceremonial feats and even underlying ideology is based more on conjecture than fact."[7]


) And Cumont himself observed, in the 50s

"The sacred books which contain the prayers recited or chanted during the [Mithraic] survives, the ritual on the initiates, and the ceremonials of the feasts, have vanished and left scarce a trace behind...[we] know the esoteric disciplines of the Mysteries only from a few indiscretions."[8]
(b) Roman Cult began after Jesus life

Our earliest evidence for the Mithraic mysteries places their appearance in the middle of the first century B.C.: the historian Plutarch says that in 67 B.C. a large band of pirates based in Cilicia (a province on the southeastern coast of Asia Minor) were practicing "secret rites" of Mithras. The earliest physical remains of the cult date from around the end of the first century A.D., and Mithraism reached its height of popularity in the third century.[9]

(c) No Continuity between Ancient Persian past and Roman Cult

Throughout most of the twentieth century Franz Cumont so influenced scholarship that the entire discipline followed in the wake of his assumption that the Roman cult was spread by the Persian cult. In the early 70's David Ulansey did for Mithric scholarship what Noan Chomsky did for linguistics, he totally redefined the coordinates by which the discipline moved. Ulansey showed that the Roman cult was not the continuance of the Persian cult, that there was no real evidence of a Persian cult. He showed that the killing of the great comic bull which latter became the major event in Mithraism, and the parallel from which Jesus Mythers get the shedding of blood and sacrifice, was not known in the Persian era. This would be like showing that the story of the Cross was not known to Christians in the first century. The major likeness to Christianity and the central point of the cult of Mithraism was not known in the time of Christ, in the time Paul, or for at least two centuries after:

There were, however, a number of serious problems with Cumont's assumption that the Mithraic mysteries derived from ancient Iranian religion. Most significant among these is that there is no parallel in ancient Iran to the iconography which is the primary fact of the Roman Mithraic cult. For example, as already mentioned, by far the most important icon in the Roman cult was the tauroctony. This scene shows Mithras in the act of killing a bull, accompanied by a dog, a snake, a raven, and a scorpion; the scene is depicted as taking place inside a cave like the mithraeum itself. This icon was located in the most important place in every mithraeum, and therefore must have been an expression of the central myth of the Roman cult. Thus, if the god Mithras of the Roman religion was actually the Iranian god Mithra, we should expect to find in Iranian mythology a story in which Mithra kills a bull. However, the fact is that no such Iranian myth exists: in no known Iranian text does Mithra have anything to do with killing a bull.
[10].

(5) Mithraism Emerged in the west only after Jesus' day

. Mithraism could not have become an influence upon the origins of the first century, for the simple reason that Mithraism did not emerge from its pastoral setting in rural Persia until after the close of the writting of the New Testament canon.[11]

(6) We Don't know what any of it means.

As Ronald Nash said: "No one can be sure that the meaning of the meals and the ablutions are the same between Christianity and Mithraism. Just because the two had them is no indication that they come to the same thing. These are entirely superficial and circumstantial arguments."[12]

(7) Mithraism was influenced by Christianity

a) Roman Soldiers Spread the cult.

Roman soldiers probably encountered Mithraism first as part of Zoroastrianism while on duty in Persia. The Cult spread through the Roman legion, was most popular in the West, and had little chance to spread through or influence upon Palestine. It's presence in Palestine was mainly confined to the Romans who were there to oppress the Jews. Kane tries to imply that these mystery cults were all indigenous to the Palestinian area, that they grew up alongside Judaism, and that the adherents to these religions all traded ideas as they happily ate together and practiced good neighborship.

b) Mithric Roman Soldiers Influenced by Christians in Palestine

But Mithraism was confined to the Roman Legion primarily, those who were stationed in Palestine to subdue the Jewish Revolt of A.D. 66-70. In fact strong evidence indicates that in this way Christianity influenced Mithraism. First, because Romans stationed in the West were sent on short tours of duty to fight the Parthians in the East, and to put down the Jewish revolt. This is where they would have encountered a Christianity whose major texts were already written, and whose major story (that of the life of Christ) was already formed.[13]


There is no real evidence for a Persian Cult of Mithras. The cultic and mystery aspect did not exist until after the Roman period, second century to fourth. This means that any similarities to Christianity probably come from Christianity as the Soldiers learned of it during their tours in Palestine. The Great historian of religions, Franz Cumont was able to prove that the earliest datable evidence for the cult came from the Military Garrison at Carnuntum, on the Danube River (modern Hungary). The largest Cache of Mithric artifacts comes form the area between the Danube and Ostia in Italy.[14]
The only real simiarity between mythrism and Christianity is the shedding of blood Both use that image in different ways and it means different things to each. As with most Jesus Myther arguments there is mo basis for the copy cat savior theory based upon upon Mithrism.


Here is a link on my original website Doxa in which I look at other figures said to be Patterns for Jesus. No copy cat savior Notes


[1] Marvin W. Meyer, ed. The Ancient Mysteries :a Sourcebook. San Francisco: Harper, 1987,201,

[2]David Ulansey. The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries: Cosmology and Salvation in the Ancient World. New York: Oxford U. Press, 1989.

[3] Richard Gordon. Image and Value in the Greco-Roman World. Aldershot: Variorum, 1996.96.

(Meyer, p 206).

[4] M.Meyer, (editor) The Ancient Mysteries : A Source Book , San Francisco: Harper, 1987,170-171,204.

[5]Edwin Yamauchi, "Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History," https://leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html

[6] Cosmic Mysteries of Mythras (--visted sept 22, 2024) http://www.mysterium.com/mithras.html


[7] David Ulansey, Mithraic Studies: Proceedings of the First International Congress of Mithraic Studies. Manchester U. Press, 1975,437.

[8] Franz Cumont. The Mysteries of Mithra. New York: Dover, 1950.152)


[9] David Ulansey, Cosmoic Mysteries of Mithras (website) http://www.mysterium.com/mithras.html

[10] Ibid.

[11] Franz Cumont, The Mysteries of Mithra (Chicago: Open Court, 1903), 87ff.

[12] Ronald Nash, "Was the New Testament Influenced by Pagan Religions?" Christian Research Journal, Winter 1994, 8

[13]Franz Cumont, Op Cit 87ff.

[14] David Ulansey, website, op cit..

____________________________


God,Science, and ideology,a book by Joseph Hinmman

God.Science, and ideology, by Joseph Hinman, is a great book. Ot argues that positions which teach the superiority of science over religion in such a way as to negate the truth content of the religious is not a scientific position but an ideological one. The books takes down such atheist greats as Dawkins and discusses the strongest God arguments.

This is an important book that spans an immense literature in a balanced and very readable form. For anyone interested in why some believe and others do not, this book will inform you of the entire range of literature in which not only can the proper questions be asked, but the reader can evaluate the often hidden ideological nature in which answers are proposed Ralph W. Hood, Jr., Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and LeRoy A. Martin Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies

"Hinman is highly stimulating, brilliant in places. It is rare to find a book so exuberant yet still rational."

--Lantz Fleming Miller, Ashoka University

https://www.amazon.com/God-Science-Ideology-examining-religious-scientific/dp/0982408765

32 comments:

Anonymous said...

Fascinating argument that Mithraism is not the (only) source of the Christian mythology. I would like to read Hinman’s study of the similarities between the story of Dionysus and Jesus. Dionysus was born of the mating of a mortal woman with God.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

I've done all the major one's they talk about, Thanks for remindigmeI meant to put a link, It's on this page, with others: https://www.doxa.ws/Myth/copycat1.html

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

hey come on man is this topic of bi more interest than that?

im-skeptical said...

"My favorite target to disprove was those who claimed Christianity,and Jesus, were copuied after Pagan sources especially Mithrism."
- There is no question that Christianity has borrowed many of its traditions, icons, and beliefs from pagan sources, but not especially from Mithraism. My question for you is: who is making these claims? It isn't Richard Carrier, the most prominent mythicist today. He says: "Mithraism as a mystery religion began around the same time Christianity did. So their early similarities come not from each other but the same earlier mold of mystery religions they were copying and building upon."

"Mithraism Emerged in the west only after Jesus' day"
- Not true. It was well established in Rome in the first century CE.

Mrs. Atheist said...

The connections between early Christianity and Mithraism are undeniable. The concept of eating one's own god is a perfect example of this. Stories of savior gods dying for the redemption of sinners is also a clear parallel between Christianity and Mithraism. Christianity is nothing but a collection of ancient Babylonian and Greco pagan religions they stole from.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

im-skeptical said...
"My favorite target to disprove was those who claimed Christianity,and Jesus, were copuied after Pagan sources especially Mithrism."
- There is no question that Christianity has borrowed many of its traditions, icons, and beliefs from pagan sources, but not especially from Mithraism.
i don't think of the foundational material is from paganism it's all present in OT.
My question for you is: who is making these claims? It isn't Richard Carrier, the most prominent mythicist today. He says: "Mithraism as a mystery religion began around the same time Christianity did. So their early similarities come not from each other but the same earlier mold of mystery religions they were copying and building upon."
Carrier is an idiot, he's bot taken seriously in academia outside of atheist ideology. There are no real similarities they are all trivial, such the use of blood. Not particularly pagan.

"Mithraism Emerged in the west only after Jesus' day"
- Not true. It was well established in Rome in the first century CE.
You didn't read it closely enoigh. The Roman cult was not preset until after the end of first century, That means no influence on Christianity until after Christian doctrine was fromed.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

The connections between early Christianity and Mithraism are undeniable. The concept of eating one's own god is a perfect example of this. Stories of savior gods dying for the redemption of sinners is also a clear parallel between Christianity and Mithraism. Christianity is nothing but a collection of ancient Babylonian and Greco pagan religions they stole from.
I have disproven that, No pagan sources had dying rising savior gods. show me the research if you think they did.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

I have fund mythers always distort the evidence. If you read books on mythology that are not trying to prove mytherism they don't say the things mythers claim they do.

im-skeptical said...

"Carrier is an idiot"
- He agrees with you on the question of Mithraism's influence on Christianity.

"The Roman cult was not preset until after the end of first century"
- You got your history wrong.

Anonymous said...

I refute your arguments like always.

Pix

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

im-skeptical said...
"Carrier is an idiot"
- He agrees with you on the question of Mithraism's influence on Christianity.

He does have some redeeming qualities.

"The Roman cult was not preset until after the end of first century"
- You got your history wrong.

6:07 PM

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

that stamen is documented, the source, it's not my idea,

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Anonymous said...
I refute your arguments like always.


Pix
Ok let's hear it

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

"Our earliest evidence for the Mithraic mysteries places their appearance in the middle of the first century B.C.: the historian Plutarch says that in 67 B.C. a large band of pirates based in Cilicia (a province on the southeastern coast of Asia Minor) were practicing "secret rites" of Mithras. The earliest physical remains of the cult date from around the end of the first century A.D., and Mithraism reached its height of popularity in the third century.[9]" David Ulansey, Cosmic Mysteries of Mithras (website) http://www.mysterium.com/mithras.html

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Mithraism could not have become an influence upon the origins of the first century, for the simple reason that Mithraism did not emerge from its pastoral setting in rural Persia until after the close of the writting of the New Testament canon.Franz Cumont, The Mysteries of Mithra (Chicago: Open Court, 1903), 87ff.

im-skeptical said...

"that stamen is documented, the source, it's not my idea,"
- Sources can be wrong, especially if they have some ideological motivation. You can easily look this up for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithraism

Anonymous said...

I proved you Metecrock wrong once again. My track record against you is almost seamless.

Pix

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

no you did not Px you w9th you could but you did not

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

My statement was talking about the Romam cult and it's exposure to Palestine. I quoted Cumont you said nothing to disprove that. you quoted no source.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

im-skeptical said...
"that stamen is documented, the source, it's not my idea,"
- Sources can be wrong, especially if they have some ideological motivation. You can easily look this up for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithraism ----you have to prove that source is wrong, Especially if it is a recognized authority such as Cumont and Ulansey, Yu can't beat an authority based upon a possibility thatthey could be biased.

im-skeptical said...

Joe, I cited an article to you. I can cite more, such as Britannica and many others. This is well-established history. The thing is, the article you cite doesn't say what you claim. What it does say is the (newer form of) Mithraism was known to exist in the Middle East - on the Mediterranean coast - 300 miles from Jerusalem - in 67 BC. Why didn't you know that? It is in direct contradiction to what you are saying. Are you simply scanning articles to cherry-pick lines that you suppose will help to make your point?

Anonymous said...

I have a question do you do online calls

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

no

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Because I am talking about the roman cult not just any belief. Also 3000 miles was a long way back then. I documented what I said.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Cumont says it didn't exist in Palestine until after the close of NT, does your argument specify what time period? If you are just talking about Cumont I just answered that,if you have others give me the sources/

im-skeptical said...

Joe, you really should read the articles you cite. The Mithraic mystery cult actually existed in the Middle East by 76 BC. This is the same cult that later spread to Rome, and existed during the rise of Christianity in the 1st century. It was inspired by Persian Mithraism, but not closely associated with it. If you believe that Cumont says it didn't exist until after the 1st century, please provide the citation where he says that.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

you are just desperate to be right about something, I never debued tgeiur existence in Mid east in 1 century AD, I said, "Our earliest evidence for the Mithraic mysteries places their appearance in the middle of the first century B.C.: the historian Plutarch says that in 67 B.C. a large band of pirates based in Cilicia (a province on the southeastern coast of Asia Minor) were practicing "secret rites" of Mithras. The earliest physical remains of the cult date from around the end of the first century A.D., and Mithraism reached its height of popularity in the third century.[9] the remainbs of the cult, implyng prior existence. In fact I said above 1st century BC. I also say "Our earliest evidence for the Mithraic mysteries places their appearance in the middle of the first century B.C.: the historian Plutarch says that in 67 B.C. a large band of pirates based in Cilicia (a province on the southeastern coast of Asia Minor) were practicing "secret rites" of Mithras. The earliest physical remains of the cult date from around the end of the first century A.D., and Mithraism reached its height of popularity in the third century.[9]

(c) No Continuity between Ancient Persian past and Roman Cult

Throughout most of the twentieth century Franz Cumont so influenced scholarship that the entire discipline followed in the wake of his assumption that the Roman cult was spread by the Persian cult. In the early 70's David Ulansey did for Mithric scholarship what Noan Chomsky did for linguistics, he totally redefined the coordinates by which the discipline moved. Ulansey showed that the Roman cult was not the continuance of the Persian cult, that there was no real evidence of a Persian cult. He showed that the killing of the great comic bull which latter became the major event in Mithraism, and the parallel from which Jesus Mythers get the shedding of blood and sacrifice, was not known in the Persian era. This would be like showing that the story of the Cross was not known to Christians in the first century. The major likeness to Christianity and the central point of the cult of Mithraism was not known in the time of Christ, in the time Paul, or for at least two centuries after:"

(c) No Continuity between Ancient Persian past and Roman Cult

Throughout most of the twentieth century Franz Cumont so influenced scholarship that the entire discipline followed in the wake of his assumption that the Roman cult was spread by the Persian cult. In the early 70's David Ulansey did for Mithric scholarship what Noan Chomsky did for linguistics, he totally redefined the coordinates by which the discipline moved. Ulansey showed that the Roman cult was not the continuance of the Persian cult, that there was no real evidence of a Persian cult. He showed that the killing of the great comic bull which latter became the major event in Mithraism, and the parallel from which Jesus Mythers get the shedding of blood and sacrifice, was not known in the Persian era. This would be like showing that the story of the Cross was not known to Christians in the first century. The major likeness to Christianity and the central point of the cult of Mithraism was not known in the time of Christ, in the time Paul, or for at least two centuries after:

the shed of blood not the existence of the cult itself, Ulancy says they barrowed from Christianity,

im-skeptical said...

So let me see if I understand your point.

We agree that the Mithraic cult existed in the Middle East a century before Christianity. And yet you are also saying that It didn't appear until after Christianity. That doesn't make sense. It is a contradiction. Where's your citation for this claim?

We agree that the Mithraic cult was not Persian Mithraism. But you still argue about that.

Despite some superficial similarities, we agree that it doesn't appear to have much influence on Christianity. And yet you are still arguing about that. You seem to be saying that "Jesus mythers" are making these claims, but I see no evidence whatsoever to support that.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

sorry to shatter your word you are not the only one I write fr. In fact I seldom, think of you as I write. I am arguing with the Jesus mythers in general. you claim I contradict by saying mythrism existed in Palestine before Christ ad didn't exist there util after Christ, I do not think I said .that quote me show me where I said it?

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

""yet you are also saying that It didn't appear until after Christianity. " I said the fragments we have that tell us of it come from after Paul's time .I did not sau it came to exist in the second centur I don't think I said when it came to exist, I spoke the time from whence our information comes. There are no Mithric texts like the Bible or the Bhagavad-Gita. Dates are hard to fix.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Mithrism is no source, that was my point. Compiling similarities is not something most historians do because it's subjective and doesn't always establish anything. I;ll post on it soon.

im-skeptical said...

Joe, I asked you what "mythers" are making these claims about Mithraism, and you never answered me. It's hard for me to figure who you are addressing your argument to.