It would be more readable and more 'reader-friendly' if you broke it up into paragraphs.
I have nt had to for 10 years. it is hard to remember
Off-topic, but as there is no topic now... it may interest Joe to see me arguing against mythicism on CARM, as this is something he argues again here a fair bit.https://forums.carm.org/threads/the-mythicist-historicist-debate.244/Pix
that's cool. you could really use the pre Mark redaction stuff there. It puts the gospel material back to mid century.
they re so ignorant, they persist in obvious folly.
Turns out the guy was a gnostic, not an atheist, so actually believed in the resurrection in a mythical sense.Pix
Post a Comment
6 comments:
It would be more readable and more 'reader-friendly' if you broke it up into paragraphs.
I have nt had to for 10 years. it is hard to remember
Off-topic, but as there is no topic now... it may interest Joe to see me arguing against mythicism on CARM, as this is something he argues again here a fair bit.
https://forums.carm.org/threads/the-mythicist-historicist-debate.244/
Pix
that's cool. you could really use the pre Mark redaction stuff there. It puts the gospel material back to mid century.
they re so ignorant, they persist in obvious folly.
Turns out the guy was a gnostic, not an atheist, so actually believed in the resurrection in a mythical sense.
Pix
Post a Comment