tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post8730116535534250218..comments2024-03-29T03:30:25.637-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Science is a Cultural Construct: Supernatural is a FactJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-63761737755296995232012-01-15T18:12:54.252-08:002012-01-15T18:12:54.252-08:00hey meant to ban that one.hey meant to ban that one.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-2416575316964001182012-01-15T17:06:06.557-08:002012-01-15T17:06:06.557-08:00Anon., calling them "laughable" doesn...Anon., calling them "laughable" doesn't actually address any of them, does it?Kristenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08252374623355509404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-6840329561053768112012-01-14T08:29:53.867-08:002012-01-14T08:29:53.867-08:00Ignorance (who is not ignorant) said:
But I don&#...Ignorance (who is not ignorant) said:<br /><br />But I don't think these thinking categories (scientific, intentional, artistic) exclude eachother as long as people don't assume one is by necessity superior to the other, though it's naturally a shame positivist philistines are still so common.<br /><br /><b>well I don't think they are either in reality but to those postivisitc scientistic types they are. you talk like they going away I think there are more now than ever. the computer revolution galvanized them.</b><br /><br />By the way, are the the same Metacrock who posted on the Quodlibeta forum? <br /><br /><b>Yes. Not for long I didn't like that forum.</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-68816585531438485112012-01-14T04:44:29.957-08:002012-01-14T04:44:29.957-08:00Your take on those failed "arguments from IQ&...Your take on those failed "arguments from IQ" is interesting, the usual approach is correctly pointing out that IQ can't be correctly equated with intelligence (of course related with your point). But I don't think these thinking categories (scientific, intentional, artistic) exclude eachother as long as people don't assume one is by necessity superior to the other, though it's naturally a shame positivist philistines are still so common.<br /><br />By the way, are the the same Metacrock who posted on the Quodlibeta forum?Ignorancehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08840540848601019925noreply@blogger.com