tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post7831069556806724620..comments2024-03-28T00:48:19.961-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Richard Carrier's Standard of Historical ProofJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-32849463416405513932013-11-02T04:22:42.475-07:002013-11-02T04:22:42.475-07:00I agree. thanks for comment.I agree. thanks for comment.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-25925611020858970952013-11-01T13:45:40.796-07:002013-11-01T13:45:40.796-07:00The use of Bayesian Probabilities in arguments abo...The use of Bayesian Probabilities in arguments about God's existence is indeed futile.<br /><br />However, it also seems to me that any critique of reason and logic ( looking at Bayesian Probability as logic ) and the proper use of such in matters of existence or non-existence in matters of Faith undermines any proper role of reason and logic in Faith.<br /><br />And, that may be as it should be: that the ineffable be truly un-said.<br /><br />Maybe not.Montaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00017648070522030951noreply@blogger.com