tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post5582793827925328758..comments2024-03-28T15:31:02.860-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Let us heal after the electionJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-89263049699471022502021-01-05T07:39:25.855-08:002021-01-05T07:39:25.855-08:00you don't know anything about it. I just quote...you don't know anything about it. I just quoted a math professor disproving your bullshit. you are so stupid you think just using the word math makes you right, Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-54764219258928188242021-01-05T03:35:31.880-08:002021-01-05T03:35:31.880-08:00You failed. I’m not surprised based on your prev...You failed. I’m not surprised based on your previous comments . Mathematics doesn’t lie People do . I won’t be posting again. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-85132640478099370932021-01-04T21:52:40.221-08:002021-01-04T21:52:40.221-08:00from
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/misin...from<br /><br />https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/misinformation-thousand-cuts-varied-rigged-election-claims-circulate-n1247476<br /><br /><br />Nov. 11, 2020, 3:55 PM CST<br />By Brandy Zadrozny<br />For Trump supporters intent on finding it, proof of the president's claims that the 2020 election was "stolen" is everywhere.<br /><br />For some, it's in the videos: the one in which a Colorado man claiming to be a poll worker, dressed in a yellow vest, rips up Trump ballots (it was a TikTok prank) or the trash bag of torn ballots found by a wedding party in an Oklahoma church (they were actually "spoiled ballots") or the testimony from a Pennsylvania postal worker who claimed he was ordered to backdate ballots mailed after Election Day (he has since recanted and also denied recanting).<br /><br />For others, the evidence of a so-called Democratic plot could be found in the numbers.<br /><br />"Is it me, or do people not understand statistics?" asked one of the 1.3 million members in Nationwide Recount 2020, a private Facebook group, presenting an impassioned, if confusing, case for why mail-in ballots in swing states were favoring Biden.<br /><br />"Benford's Law," a supporter commented, linking to an anonymous Twitter account that claimed in a series of tweets that a mathematical observation that the first digits of numbers are likely to be smaller somehow suggested widespread fraud by the Democrats.<br /><br />Posts like these, discussing a dizzying array of false claims and conspiracy theories, have dominated social and ultraconservative media since the early morning after Election Day, when President Donald Trump prematurely and incorrectly declared himself the winner. As the votes continue to be counted and Joe Biden's lead has increased (Biden was up by more than 5 million votes Wednesday), so has Trump's insistence that the election was stolen from him.<br />Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-50750405534219560892021-01-04T21:48:28.243-08:002021-01-04T21:48:28.243-08:00I looked at their link one of their main arguments...I looked at their link one of their main arguments that reaching 75% if the votes is abnormal?<br /><br />So essentially their argument is Biden got too many votes.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-67741868744988052742021-01-04T21:42:46.648-08:002021-01-04T21:42:46.648-08:00that link is a bunch of people allegations. If it ...that link is a bunch of people allegations. If it is that cut and dryied why did the court kick it out? why did Trump appointed sup court justices vote to dismiss?<br /><br />why did Trump's own Attorney general say there is no proof?Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-33293586038852062142021-01-04T19:40:31.136-08:002021-01-04T19:40:31.136-08:00Posting evidence of the fraud would be like castin...Posting evidence of the fraud would be like casting pearl before swine to you .<br />From your commentary and derision , now and in the past , you have shown that you are incapable of a reasoned non partisan and unbiased opinion.<br />The evidence is available in wonderful glorious technicolor for anybody who is looking for the truth regarding industrial scale fraud in the 2020 election . It’s a fraud. Deal with it . <br /><br /><b>If deigning to have to supply actual "evidence and stuff" is beneath you, then why are you stooping to the indignity of posting on here? Stop wasting our time. You're a clown. Deal with it.</b>7th Stoogehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11527850994226457613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-58683874251512612852021-01-04T14:28:57.650-08:002021-01-04T14:28:57.650-08:00I’ll try this one more time and see if you are cen...I’ll try this one more time and see if you are censoring or my last post was not uploaded due to my fault .<br />Just for grins I’ll post this link and see if you can show any semblance of non partisanship and reason . <br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKiyAy9vjrkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-59977141342547062892021-01-03T08:37:25.138-08:002021-01-03T08:37:25.138-08:00grow up. Just like your hero Donnie you got your a...grow up. Just like your hero Donnie you got your ass kicked and you can't accept it but you did.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-91637396912914766852021-01-03T06:11:40.292-08:002021-01-03T06:11:40.292-08:00Posting evidence of the fraud would be like castin...Posting evidence of the fraud would be like casting pearl before swine to you .<br /> From your commentary and derision , now and in the past , you have shown that you are incapable of a reasoned non partisan and unbiased opinion. <br />The evidence is available in wonderful glorious technicolor for anybody who is looking for the truth regarding industrial scale fraud in the 2020 election . It’s a fraud. Deal with it . Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-61245713817032347122021-01-02T18:48:44.011-08:002021-01-02T18:48:44.011-08:00those are great points man if it's so obvious ...those are great points man if it's so obvious and well proven why doesn't he have even one attempt to say what the proof is?Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-41240051425520666102021-01-02T17:31:56.063-08:002021-01-02T17:31:56.063-08:00Problem with that statement ( there are many probl...Problem with that statement ( there are many problems with your statement ) is that there is indisputable proof concerning the voting machines and the Internet in violation of Federal law . This proof is easily comprehended by anybody who is non partisan and unbiased and it is readily available for people who have an interest in Truth . That does not include you . The election is a fraud <br /><br /><b>Problem is, behind all this pseudo-objective bluster, allegations of proof don't constitute proof. Proof according to who or what? If it's incontrovertible proof, why can't it be established in ANY legal proceeding? <br /><br />If the opposite were true, if the Dems were screaming that the election were stolen and their claims were thrown out of court 50 times, often under OBAMA-appointed judges, what would you be saying? <br /><br />And to harp on and on about your neutrality in being a completely disinterested trier of fact, especially in this case, betrays a little of your intellectual dishonesty... Behind the phony "Cloak of Objectivity" this all boils down to "Operation Cry Baby." Remember the Republicans mocking Dems with the "Sore Loserman" moniker in 2000 over a mere handful of very dubious votes and an even more problematic SCOTUS ruling?</b>7th Stoogehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11527850994226457613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-9648993186110098622021-01-01T23:46:00.319-08:002021-01-01T23:46:00.319-08:00Anonymous said...
Problem with that statement ( th... Anonymous said...<br />Problem with that statement ( there are many problems with your statement ) is that there is indisputable proof concerning the voting machines and the Internet in violation of Federal law . <br /><br /><br /><b>no there is not, you are being lied to! Show we the proof. where is it?</b><br /><br />This proof is easily comprehended by anybody who is non partisan and unbiased and it is readily available for people who have an interest in Truth . That does not include you . The election is a fraud<br /><br /><b> that proves your alleged proof is not hard fact but feeling and attitudes, from brain washing,</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-54449097167821445532021-01-01T23:37:12.900-08:002021-01-01T23:37:12.900-08:00Mike aka MonolithTMA said...
"These are INDIS...Mike aka MonolithTMA said...<br />"These are INDISPUTABLE FACTS" 😂🤣😂🤣<br /><br />Ok, Anonymous, next tell us about the Lizard People.<br /><br /><br /><b>Rotflol! i AM JUST LUCY i DID NOT HAVE A MOUTH FULL OF MILK...</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-71083785871844660742021-01-01T15:42:57.829-08:002021-01-01T15:42:57.829-08:00Problem with that statement ( there are many probl...Problem with that statement ( there are many problems with your statement ) is that there is indisputable proof concerning the voting machines and the Internet in violation of Federal law . This proof is easily comprehended by anybody who is non partisan and unbiased and it is readily available for people who have an interest in Truth . That does not include you . The election is a fraud Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-36799556299748331042021-01-01T11:07:19.771-08:002021-01-01T11:07:19.771-08:00"These are INDISPUTABLE FACTS" 😂🤣😂🤣
..."These are INDISPUTABLE FACTS" 😂🤣😂🤣<br /><br />Ok, Anonymous, next tell us about the Lizard People.Mike aka MonolithTMAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08385705390882035829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-60438172222991709892021-01-01T09:59:21.105-08:002021-01-01T09:59:21.105-08:00even your own Attorney General admitted no proof a...even your own Attorney General admitted no proof and kicked out of court 50 times those are indisputable facts. Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-15089981187315934952021-01-01T07:57:11.297-08:002021-01-01T07:57:11.297-08:00You are wrong . It has been proven with 100% certa...You are wrong . It has been proven with 100% certainty that not only were voting machines connected to the Internet in the 2020 election which is a violation of Federal election laws , they were also communicating with foreign entities which is again a violation of Federal law and certainly criminal . These are INDISPUTABLE FACTS . . You are partisan and biased and because of this you are not capable of reason and logic when forming an opinion on these matters . In a court of law you would be classified as an “ hostile witness “ and your testimony would be scrubbed from the record . The election is a provable fraud . Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-26389862559709099112020-12-31T21:01:37.769-08:002020-12-31T21:01:37.769-08:00Anonymous said...
Of course you don’t believe that...Anonymous said...<br />Of course you don’t believe that elections are not rigged .<br />If it was proven that Republicans have cheated using technology then you would believe it . <br /><br /><b>I believe many election's most elections are not rigged. You are making tautological statements. "If it was proven that Republicans have cheated using technology then you would believe it . " if it was proven i would believe it I believe what is proven there is no proof that the election of 2020 was stolen,</b><br /><br /><br /><br />We know for a fact that people have repeatedly lied about voting machines NOT being connected to the Internet which if true is a violation of federal law and so obviously reckless and dangerous , unless of course it is deliberate and nefarious .<br /><br /><b>you don't know that, we know Russian tried to hack elections that way and that way have helped Trump win in 16, but we also put measures to protect against it.</b><br /><br /><br /><br />Truth has no agenda. Words to the wise courtesy of John Adams -<br />“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” You will be found on the wrong side of history .<br /><br /><br /><b>Trump is a liar he almost always lies. his lies have an agenda.</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-81237408353476164692020-12-31T04:59:13.824-08:002020-12-31T04:59:13.824-08:00Of course you don’t believe that elections are not...Of course you don’t believe that elections are not rigged . <br />If it was proven that Republicans have cheated using technology then you would believe it . We know for a fact that people have repeatedly lied about voting machines NOT being connected to the Internet which if true is a violation of federal law and so obviously reckless and dangerous , unless of course it is deliberate and nefarious .<br />Truth has no agenda. Words to the wise courtesy of John Adams - <br />“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” You will be found on the wrong side of history .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-79712964452707449312020-12-30T22:38:04.247-08:002020-12-30T22:38:04.247-08:00How soon you forget ! That’s your unbridled bias a...How soon you forget ! That’s your unbridled bias and pride putting scales over your eyes . One minute elections are being stolen with unverifiable software and now no such thing exists . You really need to step back and check your faculties . You are destroying any credibility you have built up with your blog on questions of science and faith by letting your hate cloud any reasoning regarding politics .<br /><br /><b>You are not at the whole picture either, First there was some evidence for this unlike with Trump. Secondly when Jill Stine lost her court case I dropped it. I did not have to wait until they kicked it out of 50 courts.</b><br /><br /><br />You mocked people who you claimed were scared to death of a Biden presidency when these are your own words from 4 years ago -<br />I am terrified. <br /><br /><b>Fearing that President Biden will be a fascist dictator is stupid. Fearing Trump will be one is just awareness of his actual goals.</b><br /><br /><br /><br />i think it has to be the end times. Maybe not by the numbers in the Revelation but the end anyway, the end for me anyway, But I don't want to get carried away with fear,<br /><br /><b>If so Trump is the anti-Christ or the prophet od the beast, Eschatological BS is the mark of real spiritual immaturity.</b><br /><br /><br />Well, you are still here and the world is still turning . Word to the wise - Truth has no agenda<br /><br /><b>that is insane of course he dies: enrich himself by any means necessary, AS means to an end his fantasy of being a dictator fits in nicely.</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-87298418120449044592020-12-30T09:17:40.886-08:002020-12-30T09:17:40.886-08:00Here is commentary from your own blog when Clinton...Here is commentary from your own blog when Clinton lost the election - <br /><br />THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2008<br />More stark realizations about the end of democracy<br />from OPed news<br /><br />Have you forgotten? Private Republican corporations count and compile the votes with secret and unverifiable software! Just as they did in 2000 and in 2004, and we all know how that turned out.<br /><br />Accordingly, the stark fact remains: the Republicans might "win" this election, regardless of the preference of the voters. The culprits who rigged the previous elections are fully aware that they might face hard time in the federal slammer if President Obama's Attorney General is ordered to investigate past elections. Thus they are acutely motivated to use their considerable resources to keep Obama out of the White House.<br /><br />How soon you forget ! That’s your unbridled bias and pride putting scales over your eyes . One minute elections are being stolen with unverifiable software and now no such thing exists . You really need to step back and check your faculties . You are destroying any credibility you have built up with your blog on questions of science and faith by letting your hate cloud any reasoning regarding politics .<br />You mocked people who you claimed were scared to death of a Biden presidency when these are your own words from 4 years ago -<br />I am terrified. i think it has to be the end times. Maybe not by the numbers in the Revelation but the end anyway, the end for me anyway, But I don't want to get carried away with fear,<br />Well, you are still here and the world is still turning . Word to the wise - Truth has no agenda Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-82134547647871475582020-12-30T08:39:23.832-08:002020-12-30T08:39:23.832-08:00You have zero knowledge of what Barr’s interest is...You have zero knowledge of what Barr’s interest is in what is the truth regarding claims of election fraud . All you have is your bias which Barr seemingly confirms with his statement .<br /><br /><b>It's all over the news media, if had a brain you would know it.Barr spilled the beans and Tru,p is going to fire him</b><br /><br /><br /><br />You keep repeating the line “ 50 courts “ as if this has any meaningful relevance to the impossible maths that are obvious to anybody with an unbiased reasoning mind . <br /><br /><br /><b>I've already documented the professor of math at Rutgers who said that is stupid. the expert says you are wrong</b><br /><br /><br />The courts have not examined any evidence presented that implicates election fraud with maths to back up those claims . <br /><br /><br /><b>yes they did they got a mathematician to testify he said it is stupid. btw you don' really understand how the math things works do you?</b><br /><br /><br />The courts have just refused to look at the evidence available to them and based their refusals on law and politics .<br /><br /><br /><b>no you must stop this it' stupid. Ever time your arguments are disproven you tell yourself another lie: "Only people who agree with me can know things." stop lying to yourself. people rejected Trump because he was a crook.</b><br /><br />Mathematics doesn’t lie. People do<br /><br /><b>right like trump. <br /><br />come on now explain step by step how the math thing works?</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-32065439477895337612020-12-30T04:46:20.733-08:002020-12-30T04:46:20.733-08:00You have zero knowledge of what Barr’s interest is...You have zero knowledge of what Barr’s interest is in what is the truth regarding claims of election fraud . All you have is your bias which Barr seemingly confirms with his statement .<br />You keep repeating the line “ 50 courts “ as if this has any meaningful relevance to the impossible maths that are obvious to anybody with an unbiased reasoning mind . The courts have not examined any evidence presented that implicates election fraud with maths to back up those claims . The courts have just refused to look at the evidence available to them and based their refusals on law and politics . <br />Mathematics doesn’t lie. People do <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-24895846136873000222020-12-29T23:27:55.229-08:002020-12-29T23:27:55.229-08:00So Barr is a barometer for truth then . If he said...So Barr is a barometer for truth then . If he said it it must be so . Why ? Do you really take statements made by people who have skin in the game to be absolute and unimpugnable , or do you only accept them when it confirms your obvious bias . The latter it is .<br />Mathematics don’t lie People do . The election is a fraud .<br /><br /><b>this statement is diametrically opposed to his own interest so it's a safe bet he's telling the truth,</b><br /><br />There is more than enough evidence and convictions for election fraud that put it beyond the realms of suspicion and firmly in the lap of reality . The larger question is what the scale and depth of election fraud has been committed by both political parties and for how long .<br /><br /><b>you have no proof of any kind, the only back up you alluded to that stupid math thing has been disproven by experts in the field, that was your only evidence. But the claimed evidence of Trump has been thrown out of court 50 times!</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-30114659735465562772020-12-29T17:01:18.848-08:002020-12-29T17:01:18.848-08:00So Barr is a barometer for truth then . If he said...So Barr is a barometer for truth then . If he said it it must be so . Why ? Do you really take statements made by people who have skin in the game to be absolute and unimpugnable , or do you only accept them when it confirms your obvious bias . The latter it is . <br /> Mathematics don’t lie People do . The election is a fraud .<br /><br />There is more than enough evidence and convictions for election fraud that put it beyond the realms of suspicion and firmly in the lap of reality . The larger question is what the scale and depth of election fraud has been committed by both political parties and for how long . <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com