tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post214590757772316854..comments2024-03-29T03:30:25.637-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Why I Do Not Consider Authorship a Compellilng IssueJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-78101791788945915432009-01-12T06:50:00.000-08:002009-01-12T06:50:00.000-08:00Hi WF. I know that Papias (110-120?) says Matt and...Hi WF. I know that Papias (110-120?) says Matt and Mark wrote the books named for them. He may be the earliest attestation. When the names appeared on the MSI'm not sure. John's name appeared early (early 2nd century) I think.<BR/><BR/>I can see an argument that Mark stands behind Mark (and Peter behind him) and that Matt wrote the Q source, some else imposed the narrative forming what what we know as the Gospel of Matt.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-77473427449947745622009-01-11T20:06:00.000-08:002009-01-11T20:06:00.000-08:00Say, Joe, at what date do you expect the tradition...Say, Joe, at what date do you expect the traditional names (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were assigned to the gospels? This is within the framework of the community authorship / oral tradition discussion. <BR/><BR/>Take care & God bless<BR/>Anne / WFWeekend Fisherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10425001168670801073noreply@blogger.com