tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post7826828495016758595..comments2024-03-28T00:48:19.961-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Notes on Realization of God's RealityJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-47676304859275389302020-02-13T21:43:41.975-08:002020-02-13T21:43:41.975-08:00the arguments Px puts out here merely serve to pro...the arguments Px puts out here merely serve to prove that he doesn't does not understand the issues, I said that Belkin transcends the physical. our ability to manipulate ideas in order to prove concepts is not equal to the task of realizing the reality of God. To disprove that he uses manipulation of idea which proves nothing.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-6317224545985496392020-02-13T21:37:22.401-08:002020-02-13T21:37:22.401-08:00Mind is not reducible to Brain
part 1
part 2<br />Mind is not reducible to Brain<br /><br /><a href="http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2014/05/mind-is-not-reduceabel-to-brain-part-1.html" rel="nofollow"><b>part 1</b></a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2014/05/mind-not-reduceable-to-brain-part-2.html" rel="nofollow"><b>part 2</b></a><br /><br />Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-88388109312698971462020-02-13T21:22:20.983-08:002020-02-13T21:22:20.983-08:00Px 2nd link
"Every atom in your body came...Px 2nd link<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />"Every atom in your body came from a star that exploded. And, the atoms in your left hand probably came from a different star than your right hand. It really is the most poetic thing I know about physics: You are all stardust."<br /><br />—Lawrence Krauss, "A Universe from Nothing," 2012<br /><br />Karauss was totally debunked by Albert/ <a href="http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-god-who-lurks-behind-modern-science.html" rel="nofollow"><b>And by me</b></a> <br /><br />The assertion that being made of Saga's star stuff means we have no immaterial consciousness is stupid. That doesn't follow.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-70600348162735142352020-02-13T21:10:50.888-08:002020-02-13T21:10:50.888-08:00Px 2nd link
Title:" You don't have a sou...Px 2nd link<br /><br />Title:" You don't have a soul: The real science that debunks superstitious charlatans<br />Trust science, not myth: Religious hucksters with claims of immortal souls are lying. Let's embrace reality."<br /><br /><b>ideological bluster that surrounds itself with the trappings of science, such as physicists giving their stupid ideological opinions with no facts,but lluion of facts because it;s science. </b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-61173503662661321852020-02-13T20:51:23.823-08:002020-02-13T20:51:23.823-08:00from PX first lik:
"Our 'minds', ...from PX first lik:<br /><br />"Our 'minds', 'souls', 'spirit' and consciousness are all physical in nature1. Thousands of years of investigation has shown us that our brains comprise and produce our true selves, although because that for most of human history we have had no understanding of how our brains work most Humans have falsely believed inferred that we have souls2 and this idea has infused our folklore, cultures, myths, religions and has instructed our interpretation of dreams3. Souls and spirits do not exist. Our bodies run themselves. We know from cases of brain damage and the effects of psychoactive drugs, that our experiences are caused by physical chemistry acting on our physical neurones in our brains. Our innermost self is our biochemical self."<br /><br /><br /><b>This is based upon misconceptions on several counts. First soul is a metaphor it's not a ghost in the machine it's a place holder for life and the processes that make life happen. So were it true that consciousnesses is reducible to brain function then that would be soul. so soul is real but it's not literally a ghost in the machine.</b><br /><br /><b>Spirit consciousness. That is not replaceable to brain function. it's not immaterial ghost but it is not physical brain structure's. The reason these guys want to reduce everything to the physical is because of their anti religious ideology not because they have scientific facts,</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-24957289977757068882020-02-13T20:31:25.297-08:002020-02-13T20:31:25.297-08:00Pixies links
Px's first link
Px's 2nd li...Pixies links<br /><br /><a href="http://www.humantruth.info/souls.html" rel="nofollow"><b>Px's first link</b></a><br /><br /><a href="https://www.salon.com/2015/01/25/you_dont_have_a_soul_the_real_science_that_debunks_superstitious_charlatans/" rel="nofollow"><b>Px's 2nd link</b></a>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-78420869402263383742020-02-13T20:19:20.583-08:002020-02-13T20:19:20.583-08:00http://www.humantruth.info/souls.html
https://www...http://www.humantruth.info/souls.html<br /><br />https://www.salon.com/2015/01/25/you_dont_have_a_soul_the_real_science_that_debunks_superstitious_charlatans/<br /><br />PixAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-22649970175221575032020-02-13T10:47:05.405-08:002020-02-13T10:47:05.405-08:00I think I was pretty that I am speaking of mental ...I think I was pretty that I am speaking of mental manipulation and mental objects. Logic is also manipulation of mental objects.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-41270816122697108212020-02-13T08:13:44.062-08:002020-02-13T08:13:44.062-08:00Proving things is a technology. As a technology It...<i>Proving things is a technology. As a technology It requires a manipulation of objects in the world.</i><br /><br />- I think that's not right. Proving things is an exercise in logic. It does not involve manipulating objects, as engineering does. It involves manipulation of information - facts or assertions about what we know or believe.im-skepticalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08267710618719895303noreply@blogger.com