tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post6382896242656521039..comments2024-03-29T03:30:25.637-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Evolutionary Development of The God Concept part 1Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-70218966479159455992017-03-22T04:59:00.696-07:002017-03-22T04:59:00.696-07:00article does not stack up to his argumentarticle does not stack up to his argumentJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-32305333833625671322017-03-22T01:05:22.172-07:002017-03-22T01:05:22.172-07:00JH: That is supposed to prove that religion is mad...JH: <i>That is supposed to prove that religion is made up entirely by humans with no<br />God involved.</i><br /><br />Where does it say that? As far as I can see, it explain why there could be religion in the absense of God, but nothing in there says it proves there is no God. This whole post looks like a straw man to me.<br /><br />PixAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com