tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post154376482154771617..comments2024-03-29T01:14:19.030-07:00Comments on Metacrock's Blog: Part 2 Have Tomb, Will Argue: Modern Archaeology verifes Eusebius' ClaimsJoseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-70492907796618551662007-06-04T01:54:00.000-07:002007-06-04T01:54:00.000-07:00Your determination to prove the veracity of the go...Your determination to prove the veracity of the gospel story is all too apparent.<BR/><BR/>Why not risk being led by the evidence and not by your faith?<BR/><BR/>Hadrian scarcely knew of the sect called the Christians. It's ridiculous to suppose he sited his great Hellenic temple directly over a tomb that a handful of Christians might have thought sacred.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-70360048677409994772007-05-16T03:27:00.000-07:002007-05-16T03:27:00.000-07:00What is the evidence for the historic Jesus? What ...What is the evidence for the historic Jesus? What contemporary writer wrote of seeing Jesus, of seeing the crowds who worhipped at his feet, who witnessed the crucifixion?<BR/><BR/>>>>how many acient world writings have immediate on the spot reporting like the 6:00 news? Almost none. It was unheard of.<BR/><BR/>There are no contemporary descriptions, only those written hundreds of years later, based on already exisiting myths of a savior.<BR/><BR/><BR/>>>>wrong. Simpley wrong, but what difference would it make? There are no contemporary discritions of Julius Ceaar or of a lot of people.<BR/><BR/>Yes, archaeology does verify things written in the present version of the Bible, things that were written about long after the supposed historic Jesus. <BR/><BR/>>>>wong! the bap is 18 years.<BR/><BR/>More detalied answers in the major blog section.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11516215.post-56542599679867467472007-05-15T21:28:00.000-07:002007-05-15T21:28:00.000-07:00What is the evidence for the historic Jesus? What...What is the evidence for the historic Jesus? What contemporary writer wrote of seeing Jesus, of seeing the crowds who worhipped at his feet, who witnessed the crucifixion?<BR/><BR/>There are no contemporary descriptions, only those written hundreds of years later, based on already exisiting myths of a savior.<BR/><BR/>Yes, archaeology does verify things written in the present version of the Bible, things that were written about long after the supposed historic Jesus.Michael A. Lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04980105313542633114noreply@blogger.com